JUST ET AL.
v.
CHAMBERS, EXECUTRIX

U.S. | 1940-10-21
No. 373
311 U.S. 634 Supreme Court of the United States (1940) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • United States v. Pelzer, 312 U.S. 399 (U.S. 1941)
    …yer in the computation of the tax for each year was entitled to one exclusion of $5,000 for each beneficiary. The court sustained both contentions and gave judgment for respondent accordingly. 90 Ct. Cls. 614; 31 F. Supp. 770. We granted certiorari, 311 U. S. 634, to resolve the conflict of the decision below with that of the Seventh Circuit in United States v. Ryerson, 114 F. 2d 150. The Government challenges both grounds of decision below. It argues that only a single $5,000 exclusion is allowable under §…
  • Just v. Chambers, 312 U.S. 383 (U.S. 1941)
    …personal liability of the owner did not survive. 113 F. 2d 105. Because of the importance of the question as to the enforceability in admiralty of the claims for personal injuries against the estate of the deceased tortfeasor, we granted certiorari, 311 U. S. 634. In support of the judgment of the Circuit Court of Appeals, respondent asks us to review the evidence with respect to the cause of the claimants’ injuries and the breach of duty by the shipowner, contending that the evidence was insufficient to su…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw