CONTINENTAL OIL CO.

v.

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD

Citator

Cited By

• Metro. Cas. Ins. Co. v. Stevens, 312 U.S. 563 (U.S. 1941)
  …ed to vacate the judgment. Appeal to the Michigan Supreme Court followed and the judgment was affirmed. 293 Mich. 31; 291 N. W. 211. Because it involved important questions concerning the removal statute (28 U. S. C. § 71), we brought the case here. 311 U. S. 637. Petitioner contends that the garnishment proceeding was removable as a separable controversy and that the state court therefore was without jurisdiction to enter the default judgment. Further, petitioner contends in substance that the petition for…
• Cont'l Oil Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 313 U.S. 212 (U.S. 1941)
  …on the Continental Oil Company challenged various provisions of an order of the Labor Board which the Circuit Court of Appeals had enforced, but we brought here only so much of the case as pertained to the reinstatement of two men, Jones and( Moore, 311 U. S. 637. Continental’s contention is that reinstatement was precluded because neither man remained an “employee” within § 2 (3) of the National Labor Relations Act. The decisive question, however, as we have ruled in the Phelps Dodge case, ante, p. 177, is…