UNITED STATES
v.
RYERSON ET AL.; AND RYERSON ET AL. V. UNITED STATES
UNITED STATES
RYERSON ET AL.; AND RYERSON ET AL. V. UNITED STATES
311 U.S. 640
Supreme Court of the United States (1940)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
United States v. Sherwood, 312 U.S. 584 (U.S. 1941)…tates being a “person indebted” within the meaning of § 795 of the Civil Practice Act, which sanctions orders by the state court authorizing a suit by a judgment creditor against a “person ... indebted to the judgment debtor.” We granted certiorari, 311 U. S. 640, the question of the jurisdiction of the District Court under the Tucker Act being of public importance. The United States, as sovereign, is immune from suit save as it consents to be sued, United States v. Thompson, 98 U. S. 486; United States v.…
-
Ryerson v. United States, 312 U.S. 405 (U.S. 1941)…he son’s widow and two for his two living descendants. The Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit reversed, 114 F. 2d 150, holding that the two trusts were the donees and that a single exclusion was allowable for each trust. We granted certiorari, 311 U. S. 640, to resolve the conflict between the decision [*408] below and that of the Court of Claims in the Pelzer case and the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit in the Hutchings case. For the reasons stated in our opinion in the Hutchings case…