MORRIS ET AL.

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Billeci v. United States, 184 F.2d 394 (D.C. Cir. 1950)
  …act is now codified under Sec. 547, Title 28, U.S.C.A. . Rev.Stat. § 787. This was then Sec. 503 of Title 28, U.S.C.A. . Act of June 19, 1934, 48 Stat. 1103, 47 U.S.C.A. § 605. . 2 Cir., 1940, 112 F. 2d 888, 134 A.L.R. 607, certiorari denied, 1940, 311 U.S. 653, 61 S.Ct. 41, 85 L.Ed. 418. . 1937, 302 U.S. 379, 58 S.Ct. 275, 82 L.Ed. 314. . 1939, 308 U.S. 338, 60 S.Ct. 266, 84 L.Ed. 307. . 1939, 308 U.S. 321, 60 S.Ct. 269, 84 L.Ed. 298. . 1945, 318 Mass. 350, 61 N.E. 2d 532. . 1936, 65 App.D.C. 231, 82…
• Monroe v. United States, 234 F.2d 49 (D.C. Cir. 1956)
  …p to the' Minifon recording device. We need iiot' decide the much discussed question-whether this constituted an interception' Within' the meaning of the statute. See United States v. Polakoff, 2 Cir., 112 F. 2d 888,134 A.L.R. 607, certiorari denied 311 U.S. 653, 61 S.Ct. 41, 85 L.Ed. 418; Reitmeister v. Reitmeister, 2 Cir., 162 F. 2d 691; Flanders v. United States, 6 Cir., 222 F. 2d 163; United States v. Yee Ping Jong, D.C.W.D.Pa., 26 F.Supp. 69; United States v. Lewis, D.C.D.D.C., 87 F.Supp. 970, reversed…
• Gregory v. United States, 253 F.2d 104 (5th Cir. 1958)
  …nce. Despite this, the Act applies since it is “immaterial whether the probable, likely use of the mails was contemplated either at the outset or during the performance of the scheme. Morris v. United States, 5 Cir., 112 F. 2d 522, certiorari denied 311 U.S. 653, 61 S.Ct. 41, 85 L.Ed. 418. The statute forbids the use of the mails as the means of consummating frauds, and if the mail is used in its actual exe [*110] cution, it matters not whether it was intended or anticipated.” Abbott v. United States, supra…