J. E. RILEY INVESTMENT CO. ET AL.

v.

SAKOW

Citator

Cited By

• Anderson v. United Gilpin Corp., 131 F.2d 819 (7th Cir. 1942)
  …fendants appealed, and the judgment of the District Court was reversed, with directions to dismiss the suit (Chain O’Mines v. United Gilpin Corp., 7 Cir., 109 F. 2d 617), on January 26, 1940. Certiorari was denied by the United States Supreme Court, 311 U.S. 659, 61 S.Ct. 14, 85 L.Ed. 422. A decree was entered in the District Court, following the filing of the record in that court, but it was not a dismissal of the suit as directed by the Circuit Court of Appeals. Included in the decree, were numerous orde…
• Stichting Mayflower Recreational Fonds and Stichting Mayflower Mountain Fonds v. Newpark Res., Inc., 917 F.2d 1239 (10th Cir. 1990)
  …to fashion an appropriate equitable remedy under the circumstances. See e.g., McKinney v. Gannett Co., Inc., 817 F. 2d 659, 670 (10th Cir.1987). See also Chain O’Mines v. United Gilpin Corporation, 109 F. 2d 617, 621 (7th Cir.1940), cert. denied, 311 U.S. 659, 61 S.Ct. 14, 85 L.Ed. 422. Furthermore, we find the district court’s use of the $30,-301.00 bid as a gauge of the benefit conferred upon Stichting to be entirely reasonable under the circumstances. III. THE 1975 MINING LEASE The district court…