FLEISHHACKER

v.

BLUM ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Maternally Yours, Inc. v. Your Maternity Shop, Inc., 234 F.2d 538 (2d Cir. 1956)
  …602; Eastern Wine Corporation v. Winslow-Warren, Ltd., 2 Cir., 1943, 137 F. 2d 955, 960, certiorari denied 1943, 320 U.S. 758, 64 S.Ct. 65, 88 L.Ed. 452; United Drug Co. v. Obear-Nester Glass Co., 8 Cir., 1940, 111 F. 2d 997, 999, certiorari denied 311 U.S. 665, 61 S.Ct. 22, 85 L.Ed. 427. The trial judge found that “Defendant’s use of the trade-mark ‘Your Maternity Shop’ was misleading, caused confusion, and did divert trade from plaintiff” and that “Defendant, with knowledge of plaintiff’s trade-mark, ad…
• Michelsen v. Penney, 135 F.2d 409 (2d Cir. 1943)
  …tually instigating suit, and the phrase “person aggrieved” in the companion provision of § 49(3), dealing with suits for penalties and forfeitures, to designate the derivative party. Cf. Fleishhacker v. Blum, 9 Cir., 109 F. 2d 543, certiorari denied 311 U.S. 665, 61 S.Ct. 23, 85 L.Ed. 427. Significantly § 48(5), which concerns suits for fraud, starts the statutory period running upon discovery by “the plaintiff, or the person under whom he claims.” But there seems no reason why we should not here take the s…
• Sweetarts v. Sunline, Inc., 380 F.2d 923 (8th Cir. 1967)
  …est universally applied is whether there is a likelihood of confusion among the consumers. David Sherman Corporation v. Heublein, Inc., 340 F. 2d 377 (8 Cir. 1965); United Drug Co. v. Obear-Nester Glass Co., 111 F. 2d 997 (8 Cir. 1940), cert. denied 311 U.S. 665, 61 S.Ct. 22, 85 L.Ed. 427. Hanson v. Triangle Publications, 163 F. 2d 74 (8 Cir. 1947), cert. denied 332 U.S. 855, 68 S.Ct. 387, 92 L.Ed., 424.; 3 Callmann, Unfair Competition and Trademarks, § 84.1 at pp. 1628-1629 (2nd Ed. 1950). Plaintiff need n…

  ← 1 / 2 →