ACME FREIGHT LINES, INC.
v.
LEE, STATE COMPTROLLER

U.S. | 1940-11-12
No. 487
311 U.S. 702 Supreme Court of the United States (1940) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • …, 45 S.Ct. 73, 69 L.Ed. 265; Miller v. Miller, 10 Cir., 134 F. 2d 583, 588, c.d. 320 U.S. 744, 64 S.Ct. 46, 88 L.Ed. 441; Parlantos v. Garoufalis, 10 Cir., 89 F. 2d 203, 205; International Co. of St. Louis v. Sloan, 10 Cir., 114 F. 2d 326, 329, c.d. 311 U.S. 702, 61 S.Ct. 142, 85 L. Ed. 455; Operator’s Oil Co. v. Barbre, 10 Cir., 65 F. 2d 857, 860. . Liberty Nat. B. & T. Co. v. Bank of America Nat. T. & S. Ass’n., 10 Cir., 218 F. 2d 831, 840; Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Gable, 10 Cir., 128 F. 2d 943, 944; Ke…
  • Reiter v. Fed. Sav. & Loan Ins. Corp., 396 F.2d 407 (7th Cir. 1968)
    …ion. In our view, the refund clause was not meant to apply after the failure of First Federal but required the continuation of business on its part. Cf. International Co. of St. Louis v. Sloan, 114 F. 2d 326, 329 (10th Cir. 1940), certiorari denied, 311 U.S. 702, 61 S.Ct. 142, 85 L.Ed. 45. It is true that under the Merger Agreement Second Federal assumed the pre-existing liabilities of First Federal. However, First Federal was not under any obligation to refund the $50,000, for its reserves would thereby…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw