ACME FREIGHT LINES, INC.
v.
LEE, STATE COMPTROLLER
ACME FREIGHT LINES, INC.
LEE, STATE COMPTROLLER
311 U.S. 702
Supreme Court of the United States (1940)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Cont'l BUS Sys., Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 325 F.2d 267 (10th Cir. 1963)…, 45 S.Ct. 73, 69 L.Ed. 265; Miller v. Miller, 10 Cir., 134 F. 2d 583, 588, c.d. 320 U.S. 744, 64 S.Ct. 46, 88 L.Ed. 441; Parlantos v. Garoufalis, 10 Cir., 89 F. 2d 203, 205; International Co. of St. Louis v. Sloan, 10 Cir., 114 F. 2d 326, 329, c.d. 311 U.S. 702, 61 S.Ct. 142, 85 L. Ed. 455; Operator’s Oil Co. v. Barbre, 10 Cir., 65 F. 2d 857, 860. . Liberty Nat. B. & T. Co. v. Bank of America Nat. T. & S. Ass’n., 10 Cir., 218 F. 2d 831, 840; Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Gable, 10 Cir., 128 F. 2d 943, 944; Ke…
-
Reiter v. Fed. Sav. & Loan Ins. Corp., 396 F.2d 407 (7th Cir. 1968)…ion. In our view, the refund clause was not meant to apply after the failure of First Federal but required the continuation of business on its part. Cf. International Co. of St. Louis v. Sloan, 114 F. 2d 326, 329 (10th Cir. 1940), certiorari denied, 311 U.S. 702, 61 S.Ct. 142, 85 L.Ed. 45. It is true that under the Merger Agreement Second Federal assumed the pre-existing liabilities of First Federal. However, First Federal was not under any obligation to refund the $50,000, for its reserves would thereby…