BAUMEISTER
v.
NEW YORK

U.S. | 1940-12-23
No. 513
311 U.S. 713 Supreme Court of the United States (1940) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • United States for the Use & Benefit of Hi-Way Elec. Co. v. The Home Indem. Co., 549 F.2d 10 (7th Cir. 1977)
    …court in the same manner as motions seeking a stay of an original proceeding in the district court. Cf. Aetna State Bank v. Altheimer, 430 F. 2d 750, 755-56 (7th Cir. 1970); Horman v. Northern Trust Co., 114 F. 2d 118, 124 (7th Cir. 1940) cert. den. 311 U.S. 713, 61 S.Ct. 394, 85 L.Ed. 464. In considering the issue of whether the district court should have granted appellants’ motion for a stay order, we cannot ignore the actions taken by Hi-Way in attempting to seek satisfaction of the Michigan federal cou…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw