GLASS

v.

ICKES

Citator

Cited By (18 total)

• Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. United States Plywood Corp., 258 F.2d 124 (2d Cir. 1958)
  …ess Co. v. Minnesota & Ontario Paper Co., 1923, 261 U.S. 45, 66, 43 S.Ct. 322, 67 L.Ed. 523. If the plywood must be physically changed, it can be a proper subject of a valid patent, Gillman v. Stern, 2 Cir., 1940, 114 F. 2d 28, 30, certiorari denied 311 U.S. 718, 61 S.Ct. 441, 85 L.Ed. 468, and “(n)othing is easier in patent litigation than to confuse a trifling physical change with the ingenuity demanded for its discovery. * * *» Refractolite Corp. v. Prismo Holding Corp., 2 Cir., 1941, 117 F. 2d 806, 807.…
• Fed. Trade Comm'n v. Cinderella Career & Finishing Schs., Inc., 404 F.2d 1308 (D.C. Cir. 1968)
  …ess release is no stranger to the judiciary. See, e.g., Barr v. Matteo, supra note 10; Kukatush Mining Co. v. SEC, 114 U.S.App.D.C. 27, 29, 309 F. 2d 647, 649 (1962); Glass v. Ickes, 73 App.D.C. 3, 117 F. 2d 273, 132 A.L.R. 1328 (1940), cert. denied 311 U.S. 718, 61 S.Ct. 441, 85 L.Ed. 468 (1941); Mellon v. Brewer, [*1318] 57 App.D.C. 126, 18 F. 2d 168, 53 A.L.R. 1519, cert. denied 275 U.S. 530, 48 S.Ct. 28, 72 L.Ed. 409 (1927). See also the cases cited in notes 49 to 51, infra. . Glass v. Ickes, supra not…
• The Int'l Glass Co., Inc. v. The United States, 408 F.2d 395 (Ct. Cl. 1969)
  …le time after completion, no steps are taken to make the invention publicly known. Kendall v. Winsor, 62 U.S. (21 How.) 322, 16 L.Ed. 165 (1858) ; Mason v. Hepburn, 13 App.D.C. 86 (1898) ; Gillman v. Stern, 114 F. 2d 28 (2d Cir. 1940), cert. denied, 311 U.S. 718, 61 S.Ct. 441, 85 L.Ed. 468 (1941). Thus, failure to file a patent application (Mason, supra) ; to describe the invention in a publicly disseminated document (Corona, supra); or to use the invention publicly (Allinson Mfg. Co. v. Ideal Filter Co., 2…