RYAN

v.

EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY ASSURANCE CORP.

Citator

Cited By

• Little v. United States, 331 F.2d 287 (8th Cir. 1964)
  …t. Therefore, appellant’s device, scheme, and artifice to defraud such duped investors was not dispelled by his deposit of their checks in National and securing credit therefor. Hart, et al. v. United States, 112 F. 2d 128 (5 Cir. 1940), cert. dis. 311 U.S. 722, 61 S.Ct. 6, 85 L.Ed. 471; cert. den. 311 U.S. 684, 61 S.Ct. 60, 85 L.Ed. 441; rehear. den. 311 U.S. 726, 61 S.Ct. 131, 85 L.Ed. 473. Regardless of the language on the deposit slips and the relationship thereby created between National, Star, and a…
• United States v. Richman, 369 F.2d 465 (7th Cir. 1966)
  …means of transporting the parcels named in Counts 1, 7 and 13. Pereira v. United States, 347 U.S. 1, 8-9, 74 S.Ct. 358, 98 L.Ed. 435 (1954); Hart v. United States, 112 F. 2d 128, 131 (5th Cir.), petition for cert. dismissed on motion of petitioner, 311 U.S. 722, 61 S.Ct. 6, 85 L.Ed. 471 (1940). Richman was charged with engaging the answering service to rermil solicitation letters prepared for mailing at his direction and mailed in bulk to the answering service, all in pursuance of his fraudulent scheme. Fu…
• Silverman v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. & Samuel M. Kaynard, 543 F.2d 428 (2d Cir. 1976)
  …v. Ordman Construction Co., 338 F. 2d 125 (6 Cir. 1964), cert. denied, 381 U.S. 925 (1965); Northern Virginia Sun Publishing Co. v. NLRB, 330 F. 2d 231 (D.C.Cir. 1964); NLRB v. Sterling Electric Motors, 114 F. 2d 738, 741 (9 Cir.), appeal dismissed, 311 U.S. 722 (1940). Under the circumstances here presented, we hold that the petition should be granted. The employees should not be forced to rely upon the Board’s belated assurances that it will get around to their claims. We reject the Board’s contention t…