MANUFACTURERS TRUST CO. ET AL.
v.
PRUDENCE SECURITIES ADVISORY GROUP ET AL.; ENDELMAN ET AL. V. PRUDENCE-BONDS CORP. ET AL.; KELBY, TRUSTEE, V. PRUDENCE SECURITIES ADVISORY GROUP ET AL.; PRUDENCE REALIZATION CORP. V. PRUDENCE-BONDS CORP.; AND DAVISON V. PRUDENCE SECURITIES ADVISORY GROUP ET AL.
MANUFACTURERS TRUST CO. ET AL.
PRUDENCE SECURITIES ADVISORY GROUP ET AL.; ENDELMAN ET AL. V. PRUDENCE-BONDS CORP. ET AL.; KELBY, TRUSTEE, V. PRUDENCE SECURITIES ADVISORY GROUP ET AL.; PRUDENCE REALIZATION CORP. V. PRUDENCE-BONDS CORP.; AND DAVISON V. PRUDENCE SECURITIES ADVISORY GROUP ET AL.
312 U.S. 649
Supreme Court of the United States (1941)
Negative Treatment
Cited by 5 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam:
The petitions for writs of certiorari are granted and the judgment is reversed on the authority of Reconstruction Finance Corp. v. Prudence Securities Advisory Group, 311 U. S. 579.
Messrs. Dan Gordon Judge, John Ross Delafield, Edwin De T. Bechtel, Ralph W. Crolly, and Emery H. Sykes for petitioners in No. 210. Messrs. Jacob A. Freedman and Edward Endelman for petitioners in No. 211. Mr. Charles A. Frueauff for petitioner in No. 214. Mr. Irving L. Schanzer for petitioner in No. 259. Mr. Alfred T. Davison pro se, in No. 273.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Hayes Wood v. Ford, 148 Fla. 66 (Fla. 1941)…fit. The cestui que trust owner is domiciled in Dade County, Florida. See Hunt v. Turner, 54 Fla. 654, 45 So. 509; Starkey v. Carson, 138 Fla. 301,189 So. 385; Commonwealth v. Stewart, 338 Pa. 9, 12 A. (2nd) 444, affirmed in Stewart v. Commonwealth, 312 U. S. 649, 61 Sup. Ct. 445, 85 L. Ed. 1101. See also Maguire v. Trefry, 253 U. S. 12, 40 Sup. Ct. 417, 64 L. Ed. 739; Blodgett v. Silberman, 277, U. S. 1, 48 Sup. Ct. 410, 72 L. Ed. 749; City of St. Albans vs. Avery, 95 Vt. 249, 114 A. 31; Certiorari denied 2…
-
State Tax Comm'n of Utah v. Aldrich, 316 U.S. 174 (U.S. 1942)…onstitutional basis of First National Bank v. Maine could be reexamined in the light of such recent decisions as Curry v. McCanless, 307 U. S. 357, and Graves v. Elliott, 307 U. S. 383. And see Commonwealth v. Stewart, 338 Pa. 9, 12 A. 2d 444, aff’d 312 U. S. 649. There can be no doubt but that the judgment below should be affirmed if First National Bank v. Maine is to survive, as the judgment in that case prohibited the State of Maine from doing what the State of Utah is here attempting. But we do not thin…
-
Graves v. Schmidlapp, 315 U.S. 657 (U.S. 1942)…Wheat Co. v. Grand Forks, 253 U. S. 325; Blodgett v. Silberman, 277 U. S. 1; Virginia v. Imperial Coal Sales Co., 293 U. S. 15; First Bank Stock Corp. v. Minnesota, 301 U. S. 234, 239-40, and cases cited; Stewart v. Pennsylvania, 338 Pa. 9, affirmed 312 U. S. 649; cf. Carpenter v. Pennsylvania, 17 How. 456 (before Fourteenth Amendment); also Farmers Loan & Trust Co. v. Minnesota, 280 U. S. [*662] 204; Baldwin v. Missouri, 281 U. S. 586; Beidler v. South Carolina, 282 U. S. 1 (all recognizing the power of the…
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Reconstr. Fin. Corp. v. Prudence Sec. Advisory Grp., 311 U.S. 579 (U.S. 1941)