KANSAS

v.

MISSOURI

Citator

Cited By

• Pang-Tsu MOW v. Republic OF China (two cases), 201 F.2d 195 (D.C. Cir. 1952)
  …for finality. Reconciliation of the Rule with the statute requires that the former be not construed so as to supplant the exception. Furthermore, in Sibbach v. Wilson & Co., 1941, 312 [*198] U.S. 1, 10, 61 S.Ct. 422, 85 L.Ed. 479, rehearing denied, 312 U.S. 655, 61 S.Ct. 422, 85 L.Ed. 479, the Court, citing and construing 48 Stat. 1064 (1934), 28 U.S.C. § 723b (1946) [now § 2072], which empowered it to promulgate procedural rules for the district courts, said that the Court was unable “by rule, to extend o…
• Whitney v. Johnson, 314 U.S. 574 (U.S. 1941)
  …Per Curiam: The judgment is affirmed. (1) South Carolina Highway Dept. v. Barnwell Bros., 303 U. S. 177; Maurer v. Hamilton, 309 U. S. 598; Philadelphia-Detroit Lines, Inc. v. Simpson, 312 U. S. 655; Darnall Trucking Co. v. Simpson, 313 U. S. 549; (2) Sproles v. Binford, 286 U. S. 374, 395-96.…