DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY OF INDIANA ET AL.

v.

WOOD PRESERVING CORP.

Citator

Cited By

• Toucey v. N.Y. Life Ins. Co., 314 U.S. 118 (U.S. 1941)
  …x was bound by the former decree, and that the prohibition of § 265 was no bar to an injunction. The Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed, 115 F. 2d 1, and because of the relation of the questions presented to those in No. 16, we brought the case here. 312 U. S. 670. The courts below have thus decided that the previous federal judgments are res judicata in the state proceedings, and that therefore, notwithstanding the prohibitory provisions of § 265, the federal courts may use their in-junctive powers to save…
• Dep't of Treas. of Ind. v. Wood Preserving Corp., 313 U.S. 62 (U.S. 1941)
  …the Federal Constitution as laid upon income received outside the State and as constituting an unlawful burden upon interstate commerce. 114 F. 2d 922. In view of the asserted conflict with applicable decisions of this Court, certiorari was granted, 312 U. S. 670. The facts were found in accordance with the stipulation of the parties. Respondent is a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business at Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. It is qualified to do business in Indiana but has no agents or employees…
• Harris v. Zion's Sav. Bank & Tr. Co., 317 U.S. 447 (U.S. 1943)
  …lty will be created by requiring the obtaining of such an order. If it forbids, then no conflict between the policies of state and nation will arise. The judgment is Affirmed. 11 U. S. C. § 203. In re Harris’ Estate, 99 Utah 464, 105 P. 2d 461. 312 U. S. 670. Harris v. Zion’s Savings Bank & Trust Co., 313 U. S. 541. 127 F. 2d 1012. Compare In re Buxton’s Estate, 14 F. Supp. 616; In re Reynolds, 21 F. Supp. 369; Lemm v. Northern California National Bank, 93 F. 2d 709; Hines v. Farkas, 109 F. 2d 289.…