LUZON BROKERAGE CO., INC.

v.

PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (37 total)

• United States v. Isaacs, 493 F.2d 1124 (7th Cir. 1974)
  …they “may be convicted of the mailing of a letter which one of [their] partners caused to be mailed in the execution of the scheme.” Chambers v. United States, 8 Cir., 237 F. 513, 524; Baker v. United States, 8 Cir., 115 F. 2d 533, 540, cert. denied 312 U.S. 692, 61 S.Ct. 711, 85 L.Ed. 1128. We do not find anything in United States v. Maze, 414 U.S. 395, 94 S.Ct. 645, 38 L.Ed.2d 603, decided by the Supreme Court on January 8, 1974, which would require reversal on any of these four mail fraud counts. In tha…
• United States v. Bisceglia, 420 U.S. 141 (U.S. 1975)
  …mons was styled “In the matter of the tax liability of John Doe” is not sufficient ground for denying enforcement. The use of such fictitious names is common in indictments, see, e. g., Baker v. United States, 115 F. 2d 533 (CA8 1940), cert. denied, 312 U. S. 692 (1941), and other types of compulsory process. Indeed, the Courts of Appeals have regularly enforced Internal Revenue Service summonses which did not name a specific taxpayer who was under investigation. E. g., United States v. Carter, 489 F. 2d 413…
• Isaacs v. United States, 301 F.2d 706 (8th Cir. 1962)
  …execution, may become the acts of all the partners, and each may be convicted of the mailing of a letter which one of his partners caused to be mailed in the execution of the scheme,’ ” Baker v. United States, 8 Cir., 115 F. 2d 533, 540, cert. den. 312 U.S. 692, 61 S.Ct. 711, 85 L.Ed. 1128. See also Steiner v. United States, 5 Cir., 134 F. 2d 931, 934, cert. den. 319 U.S. 774, 63 S.Ct. 1439, 87 L.Ed. 1721. By applying the foregoing principles we conclude that there was substantial-evidence from which the…