MOODY ET AL.
v.
JAMES IRRIGATION DISTRICT, DEBTOR

U.S. | 1941-02-17
No. 699
312 U.S. 693 Supreme Court of the United States (1941) Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • …claims which would exonerate defendant would be tantamount to a decree that the claims are invalid.” The defendant was adjudged guilty of infringement. In Casco Products Corporation v. Sinko Tool & Mfg. Co., 7 Cir., 116 F. 2d 119, certiorari denied 312 U.S. 693, 61 S.Ct. 713, 85 L.Ed. 1129, a licensee was held estopped to deny the validity of the patents under which it was licensed but the court limited the scope of the estoppel. The court held that the defendant was “not estopped to prove that its devices…
  • Hall Labs. v. Nat'l Aluminate Corp., 224 F.2d 303 (3d Cir. 1955)
    …tioner may not, in this suit, challenge the validity of the licensed patents.” Nevertheless, Hall attempts to render its practices royalty-free upon Casco Products Corp. v. Sinko Tool & Mfg. Co., 7 Cir., 1940, 116 F. 2d 119, certiorari denied 1940, 312 U.S. 693, 61 S.Ct. 713, 85 L.Ed. 1129; and see the alternative basis for our decision in Automatic Paper [*308] Machinery Co. v. Marcalus Mfg. Co., 3 Cir., 1945, 147 F. 2d 608, 610-612. These cases are the product of Westinghouse Electric & Mfg. Co. v. Formi…
  • …ons 155 and 156, Livesay v. Drolet, D.C.S.D.Fla.1941, 38 F.Supp. 885; Livesay Industries, Inc., v. Livesay Window Co., 5 Cir., 1953, 202 F. 2d 378. . E. g. Sinko Tool & Mfg. Co. v. Casco Products Corp., 7 Cir., 1937, 89 F. 2d 916, certiorari denied 312 U.S. 693, 61 S.Ct. 713, 85 L.Ed. 1129; Midland Steel Products Co. v. Clark Equipment Co., 6 Cir., 1949, 174 F. 2d 541, certiorari denied 338 U.S. 892, 70 S.Ct. 243, 94 L.Ed. 548; Dixie-Vortex Co. v. Paper Container Mfg. Co., 7 Cir., 1942, 130 F. 2d 569, cert…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw