HUSSOCK
v.
STATE OF NEW YORK
HUSSOCK
STATE OF NEW YORK
312 U.S. 694
Supreme Court of the United States (1941)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Blanche H. Lober v. Moore, 417 F.2d 714 (D.C. Cir. 1969)…N.Y. 14, 9 N.E. 2d 758, 112 A.L.R. 401 (1937); Crosland-Cullen Co. v. Crosland, 249 N.C 167, 105 S.E. 2d 655 (1958). See also Lustik v. Rankila, 269 Minn. 515, 131 N.W. 2d 741 (1964). . 72 App.D.C. 303, 304, 114 F. 2d 582, 583 (1940), cert. denied 312 U.S. 694, 61 S.Ct. 732, 85 L.Ed. 1130 (1941). . “Our previous decisions are' not technically res judicata as between appellant and appellee, since the latter was not a party to any of the prior proceedings. But those determinations are conclusive against ap…
-
Williams v. Cap. Transit Co., 215 F.2d 487 (D.C. Cir. 1954)…judge, plaintiff advised that she did not desire to make her a witness. Where there was no issue of fact, there was no question for the jury. Fletcher v. Evening Star Newspaper Co., 1940, 72 App.D.C. 303, 307, 114 F. 2d 582, certiorari denied, 1941, 312 U.S. 694, 61 S.Ct. 732, 85 L.Ed. 1130.2 The trial judge concluded that service upon Jane Douglas was not service upon the defendant, because 311 Madison Street was not his place of abode when the marshal left papers with her. Thus the District Court never ac…