ROBBINS

v.

SANFORD, WARDEN

Citator

Cited By

• Himmelfarb v. United States, 175 F.2d 924 (9th Cir. 1949)
  …* when it appears that a free and fair trial cannot be had it ought to be stopped, even over objection of the accused, and the Constitution will not prevent another and better trial.” Sanford v. Robbins, 5 Cir., 115 F. 2d 435, 439, certiorari denied 312 U.S. 697, 61 S.Ct. 737, 85 L.Ed. 1132. It has been held that the discharge of the jury, after jeopardy had attached and before verdict, would not sustain a plea of once in jeopardy where the jury could not agree, United States v. Perez, 9 Wheat. 579, 22 U.S…
• Cannon Constr. Co., Inc. v. The United States, 319 F.2d 173 (Ct. Cl. 1963)
  …54 L.Ed. 587 (1910). . Langoma Industries, Inc. v. United States, 135 F.Supp. 282, 133 Ct.Cl. 248 (1955) ; Coath & Goss, Inc. v. United States, 101 Ct.Cl. 653, 661 (1944) ; Seeds & Derham v. United States, 92 Ct.Cl. 97, 108-112 (1940), cert. denied 312 U.S. 697, 61 S.Ct. 731, 85 L.Ed. 1131. . 49 Ct.Cl. 538, 552 (1914). . Paragon Oil Co., ASBCA No. 3980, 58-2 BCA ¶ 1845, 7307.…
• Brock & Blevins Co., Inc. v. The United States, 343 F.2d 951 (Ct. Cl. 1965)
  …y. It stated: “There was no delay in construction due to late delivery of materials or equipment.” [Emphasis added.] There is a striking similarity between this case and the case of Seeds & Derham v. United States, 92 Ct.Cl. 97 (1940), cert. denied 312 U.S. 697, 61 S.Ct. 731, 85 L.Ed. 1131 (1941). In Seeds & Derham, supra, extra work was performed under the contract by plaintiffs. This extra work caused delay damages for increased overhead and labor. Plaintiffs agreed to a contract modification under the c…