BALTIMORE & OHIO RAILROAD CO.
v.
KEPNER
BALTIMORE & OHIO RAILROAD CO.
KEPNER
313 U.S. 542
Supreme Court of the United States (1941)
Caution
Also reported at: 85 L. Ed. 1510 · 61 S. Ct. 841 · SCDB 1940-176 · 1941 U.S. LEXIS 735
Cited by 17 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam:
The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Baltimore & Ohio R.R. Co. v. Kepner, 314 U.S. 44 (U.S. 1941)…was deemed a federal question of substance,1 undecided by this Court, and concerning which there was lack of uniformity in the state court decisions,2 certiorari was granted, 312 U. S. 671, the decree below affirmed here by an equally divided court, 313 U. S. 542, and the petition for rehearing allowed, 313 U. S. 597. [*48] This proceeding originally was brought by the petitioner, an interstate railroad, in the Court of Common Pleas of Hamilton County, Ohio, against the respondent Kepner, an injured resident…
-
The Three Affiliated Tribes of the Fort Berthold Reservation v. The United States, 390 F.2d 686 (Ct. Cl. 1968)…t. A mere disparity is not sufficient. Creek Nation v. United States, 97 Ct.Cl. 602, 612 (1942), cert. denied, 318 U.S. 787, 63 S.Ct. 980, 87 L.Ed. 1154 (1943); Seminole Nation v. United States, 92 Ct.Cl. 210, 216 (1940), cert. denied, 313 U.S. 563, 61 S.Ct. 841, 85 L.Ed. 1523 (1941). A second difference in result is that appellant would be entitled to recover interest on any claim arising under the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution. Interest from the time of taking is automatically included in order to…
-
In re Ira Laurence Hunter v. Ira Laurence Hunter, 780 F.2d 1577 (11th Cir. 1986)….D.Ohio 1983); In re Musser, 24 B.R. 913 [*1580] (W.D.Va.1982); In re Colasante, 12 B.R. 635 (E.D.Pa.1981). In spite of Schweig’s protestations to the contrary, Davison-Paxon Co. v. Caldwell, 115 F. 2d 189 (5th Cir.1941), cert. denied 313 U.S. 564, 61 S.Ct. 841, 85 L.Ed. 1523 (1941), remains the law of this circuit on failure to disclose and states that “not making full disclosure ... is not within the exception.” The court was clear that there must be actual overt false pretense or representation to come…
Previewing 3 of 9 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence