CALIFORNIA

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Safe Harbor Water Power Corp. v. Fed. Power Comm'n, 124 F.2d 800 (3d Cir. 1941)
  …complaint did not state a cause of action requiring a three-judge court was correct, then the Supreme Court was without any appellate jurisdiction whatsoever. The Supreme Court dismissed both appeals, Safe Harbor Water Power Corp. v. United States, 313 U.S. 546, 61 S.Ct. 1084, 1085, 85 L.Ed. 1512, .and cited cases holding mandamus and not appeal to be the remedy when a three-judge should have been convened. It then referred to Section 313(b). If we are correct in our interpretation of this decision, we t…
• The Chemehuevi Tribe OF Indians v. Fed. Power Comm'n, 489 F.2d 1207 (D.C. Cir. 1973)
  …; cf. FPC v. Union Electric Co., 381 U.S. 90, 110-112 n. 30, 85 S.Ct. 1253, 14 L.Ed.2d 239 (1965); id. at 112 n. 1, 85 S.Ct. 1253 (Goldberg, J., dissenting). But see Safe Harbor Water Power Co. v. FPC, 124 F. 2d 800, 808 (3d Cir.), appeal dismissed, 313 U.S. 546, 61 S.Ct. 1084, 85 L.Ed. 1512 (1941). . The Court did consider several earlier cases involving various aspects of the Act. See United States v. Appalachian Power Co., 311 U.S. 377, 61 S.Ct. 291, 85 L.Ed. 243 (1940); Broad River Power Co. v. Query,…

  ← 1 / 2 →

Authorities Cited

• Principality of Monaco v. Mississippi, 292 U.S. 313 (U.S. 1934)
• Williams v. United States, 289 U.S. 553 (U.S. 1933)
• Kansas v. United States, 204 U.S. 331 (U.S. 1907)