CHESAPEAKE & OHIO RAILWAY CO.

v.

RICHARDSON

Citator

Cited By (44 total)

• McNALLY v. United States, 483 U.S. 350 (U.S. 1987)
  …bane); United States v. Rauhoff, 525 F. 2d 1170 (CA7 1975) (bribing State Secretary of State); United States v. Faser, 303 F. Supp. 380 (ED La. 1969) (scheme to bribe state officials). In Shushan v. United States, 117 F. 2d 110 (CA5), cert. denied, 313 U. S. 574 (1941), the Fifth Circuit upheld the mail fraud prosecution of a member of a Louisiana parish levy board for receiving kickbacks from the underwriters of a plan to refund outstanding bonds of the levy district. Explaining why it rejected the argumen…
• United States v. Isaacs, 493 F.2d 1124 (7th Cir. 1974)
  …only that its legitimate official action and purpose shall be defeated by misrepresentation, chicane or the overreaching of those charged with carrying out the governmental intention. In Shushan v. United States, 5 Cir., 117 F. 2d 110, cert. denied 313 U.S. 574, 61 S.Ct. 1085, 85 L.Ed. 1531, it was recognized that No trustee has more sacred duties than a public official and any scheme to obtain an advantage by corrupting such an one must in the federal law be considered a scheme to defraud. 117 F. 2d at 1…
• United States v. Mandel, 591 F.2d 1347 (4th Cir. 1979)
  …95 S.Ct. 1951, 44 L.Ed.2d 450 (1975), such an allegation is not necessary to bring the alleged scheme within the purview of the mail fraud statute, for, as the court stated in Shushan v. United States, 117 F. 2d 110, 115 (5th Cir. 1941), cert. den., 313 U.S. 574, 61 S.Ct. 1085, 85 L.Ed. 1531, “A scheme to get a public contract on more favorable terms than would likely be got otherwise by bribing a public official would not only be a plan to commit the crime of bribery, but would also be a scheme to defraud…

  ← 1 / 2 →