SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA

v.

CAMINETTI, INSURANCE COMMISSIONER

Citator

Cited By (11 total)

• Welch v. Terhune, 126 F.2d 695 (1st Cir. 1942)
  …te, is, to that extent, the equivalent of a power to ‘revoke’, and when otherwise so exercisable as to effect a change in the enjoyment, is the equivalent of a power to ‘alter’.” In Mellon v. Driscoll, 3 Cir., 1941, 117 F. 2d 477, certiorari denied 313 U.S. 579, 61 S.Ct. 1100, 85 L.Ed. 1536, a power to terminate was held to fall within § 302(d) of the 1926 Act. In the trust instrument there was also given the power to “amend”. The plaintiffs contend that this power must be strictly construed so as to refe…
• In re Stafos v. Laurence M. Jarvis in Bankruptcy, 477 F.2d 369 (10th Cir. 1973)
  …law. One court has held that in the absence. of ascertainable state court interpretation, the bankruptcy court must construe the statute and determine its application. Doethlaff v. Penn Mut. Life Ins. Co., 117 F. 2d 582 (6th Cir. 1941), cert. denied 313 U.S. 579, 61 S.Ct. 1100, 85 L.Ed. 1536 (1941). In addition, the rights of creditors have been held in “limbo” awaiting resolution of this exemption issue for more than two years. This case does not present all of those “special circumstances” dictating the i…
• Hurd v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 160 F.2d 610 (1st Cir. 1947)
  …irected and is a retained power to “alter, amend, or revoke.” Chickering v. Commissioner, 1 Cir., 118 F. 2d 254, 139 A.L.R. 508, certiorari denied 314 U.S. 636, 62 S. Ct. 70, 86 L.Ed. 511; Mellon v. Driscoll, 3 Cir., 117 F. 2d 477, certiorari denied 313 U.S. 579, 61 S.Ct. 1100, 85 L.Ed. 1536; Estate of Albert E. Nettleton, 4 T.C. 987. It is akin to the case of an uncontrolled power of acceleration, or termination, in the donor. Commissioner v. Estate of Holmes, 326 U.S. 480, 66 S.Ct. 257. The estate mainta…