KIMMICH
v.
NEW YORK CLEARING HOUSE ASSOCIATION ET AL.

U.S. | 1941-04-07
No. 342
313 U.S. 597 Supreme Court of the United States (1941) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Baltimore & Ohio R.R. Co. v. Kepner, 314 U.S. 44 (U.S. 1941)
    …by this Court, and concerning which there was lack of uniformity in the state court decisions,2 certiorari was granted, 312 U. S. 671, the decree below affirmed here by an equally divided court, 313 U. S. 542, and the petition for rehearing allowed, 313 U. S. 597. [*48] This proceeding originally was brought by the petitioner, an interstate railroad, in the Court of Common Pleas of Hamilton County, Ohio, against the respondent Kepner, an injured resident employee, to enjoin his continued prosecution of a sui…
  • Harmsen v. Smith, 542 F.2d 496 (9th Cir. 1976)
    …of the insolvent association, is not an asset of the association of which the FDIC must take possession.2 See, e. g., Kimmich v. Potter, 112 F. 2d 135, 136 (2d Cir.), cert. [*501] denied, 311 U.S. 653, 61 S.Ct. 47, 85 L.Ed. 418 (1940), reh. denied, 313 U.S. 597, 61 S.Ct. 832, 85 L.Ed. 1550 (1941). Nor does 12 U.S.C. § 1821(d), which makes it the duty of the FDIC receiver to enforce “the individual liability of the stockholders and directors” of a national bank, embrace liabilities owed directly by such st…
    1 / 2

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw