AUTOMATIC DEVICES CORP.
v.
SINKO TOOL & MANUFACTURING CO.

U.S. | 1941-11-10
No. 6
314 U.S. 94 Supreme Court of the United States (1941) Negative Treatment
Also reported at: 86 L. Ed. 65 · 62 S. Ct. 42 · 1941 U.S. LEXIS 1288 · SCDB 1941-026
Cited by 96 cases
Opinion of the Court
Me. Justice Douglas

Mr. Justice Douglas delivered the opinion of the Court.

This is a companion case to Cuno Engineering Corp. v. Automatic Devices Corp., ante, p. 84. The court below held that claims 2, 3, and 11 of the Mead patent (No. 1,736,544) were invalid and not infringed. 112 F. 2d 335. We granted the petition for certiorari limited to the question of validity of those claims. For the reasons stated in Cuno Engineering Corp. v. Automatic Devices Corp., supra, the judgment is

Affirmed.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By (44 total)

  • Kasischke v. State, 991 So. 2d 803 (Fla. 2008)
    …upplied). . See Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary 53 (10th ed.1996) (“any ... adj .... unmeasured or unlimited in amount, number, or extent" (emphasis supplied)). . See Fed. Land Bank of St. Paul v. Bismarck Lumber Co., 314 U.S. 95, 100, 62 S.Ct. 1, 86 L.Ed. 65 (1941) (“[T]he term 'including' is not one of all-embracing definition, but connotes simply an illustrative application of the general principle." (emphasis supplied)); see also Phelps Dodge Corp. v. NLRB, 313 U.S. 177, 189, 61 S.Ct. 845, 85 L.Ed. 1…
  • Pro-Art Dental LAB, Inc. v. V-Strategic Grp., LLC, 986 So. 2d 1244 (Fla. 2008)
    …phrase “including motions to quash” logically implies that motions to quash are included in addition to, not to the exclusion of, other permissible motions. See, e.g., Fed. Land Bank of St. Paul v. Bismarck Lumber Co., 314 U.S. 95, 100, 62 S.Ct. 1, 86 L.Ed. 65 (1941) (“[T]he term ‘including’ is not one of all-embracing definition, but connotes simply an illustrative application of the general principle.” (emphasis supplied)); see also Black’s Law Dictionary 777-78 (8th ed.2004) (defining the generally ill…
  • Sys. Components Corp. v. Fla. Dep't OF Transp., 14 So. 3d 967 (Fla. 2009)
    …(“[T]he term ‘including’ is not one of all-embracing definition, but connotes simply an illustrative application of the general principle.” (emphasis omitted) (quoting Fed. Land Bank of St. Paul v. Bismarck Lumber Co., 314 U.S. 95, 100, 62 S.Ct. 1, 86 L.Ed. 65 (1941))). Therefore, the doctrine of avoidable consequences/cost-to-cure approach may similarly apply to business damages when, limited to a proposed, reasonably feasible restoration of the business on the parent tract. See Mulkey, 448 So. 2d at 10…

Previewing 3 of 44 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw