E. E. MORGAN CO., INC.
v.
ARKANSAS FOR USE AND BENEFIT OF PHILLIPS COUNTY
E. E. MORGAN CO., INC.
ARKANSAS FOR USE AND BENEFIT OF PHILLIPS COUNTY
314 U.S. 571
Supreme Court of the United States (1941)
Per_curiam
Per Curiam:
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. (1) Stewart & Co. v. Sadrakula, 309 U. S. 94, 105; James v. Dravo Contracting Co., 302 U. S. 134, 149; General Construction Co. v. Fisher, 295 U. S. 715; Trinityfarm Construction Co. v. Grosjean, 291 U. S. 466, 472; (2) International Harvester Co. v. Kentucky, 234 U. S. 579, 588- 89; Natural Gas Co. v. Slattery, 302 U. S. 300, 306-7.
Mr. Wm. M. Hall for appellant. Mr. Leo J. Mundt for ap-pellee.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- James v. Dravo Contracting Co., 302 U.S. 134 (U.S. 1937)
- Int'l Harvester Co. of Am. v. Commonwealth of Ky., 234 U.S. 579 (U.S. 1914)
- Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Slattery, 302 U.S. 300 (U.S. 1937)
- James Stewart & Co. v. Sadrakula, 309 U.S. 94 (U.S. 1940)
- Trinityfarm Constr. Co. v. Grosjean, 291 U.S. 466 (U.S. 1934)
- Gen. Constr. Co. v. Fisher, 295 U.S. 715 (U.S. 1935)