TRENT ET AL.
v.
HUNT ET AL.
TRENT ET AL.
HUNT ET AL.
314 U.S. 573
Supreme Court of the United States (1941)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam:
The judgment is affirmed. Beal v. Missouri Pacific R. Co., 312 U. S. 45, 49-51; Watson v. Buck, 313 U. S. 387, 400-01.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Beauharnais v. Illinois, 343 U.S. 250 (U.S. 1952)…ed in majority opinion at n. 5. People v. Simcox, 379 Ill. 347, 40 N. E. 2d 525; People v. White Circle League, 408 Ill. 564, 97 N. E. 2d 811 (1951). See also Fox Film Corp. v. Collins, 236 Ill. App. 281; Bevins v. Prindable, 39 F. Supp. 708, aff’d 314 U. S. 573. Indeed, if the Illinois courts had been inclined to interpret their statute as this Court now interprets it, they could have done so only by reading out of their statute the disjunctive clause “or which [*283] is productive of breach of the peace…
-
Bradley v. Milliken, 433 F.2d 897 (6th Cir. 1970)…, 28 S.Ct. 441, 52 L.Ed. 714; Arneson v. Denny, 25 F. 2d 993 (W.D.Wash.); James v. Almond, 170 F.Supp. 331, 341-342 (E.D.Va.), appeal dismissed, 359 U.S. 1006, 79 S.Ct. 1146, 3 L.Ed.2d 987; Bevins v. Prindable, 39 F.Supp. 708, 710 (E.D.Ill.), aff’d, 314 U.S. 573, 62 S.Ct. 116, 86 L.Ed. 465. That part of the order of the District Court dismissing the Governor and Attorney General of Michigan as parties defendant is reversed. Affirmed in part, reversed in part and remanded to the District Court for further…
Authorities Cited
- Watson v. Buck, 313 U.S. 387 (U.S. 1941)
- Beal v. Mo. Pac. R.R. Corp., 312 U.S. 45 (U.S. 1941)