EX PARTE LLOYD WILEY; EX PARTE DAVID H. JOHNSON; EX PARTE ANDREW FREY; EX PARTE BEN SIMS; EX PARTE DANIEL PATRICK DOYLE; EX PARTE CHARLES LEFKOWITZ; EX PARTE HOMER FRANKS; EX PARTE WILLIAM H. PADGETT; EX PARTE FRED REGER; EX PARTE WILLIAM BARBER; EX PARTE FRANK ROBERSON; EX PARTE STANLEY B. PEPLOWSKI; EX PARTE HERMAN BARMORE; EX PARTE KENNETH GERARD; EX PARTE GEORGE D. LATIMER; EX PARTE ERNEST DIEFENBACH; AND EX PARTE JOHN R. MILLER
EX PARTE LLOYD WILEY; EX PARTE DAVID H. JOHNSON; EX PARTE ANDREW FREY; EX PARTE BEN SIMS; EX PARTE DANIEL PATRICK DOYLE; EX PARTE CHARLES LEFKOWITZ; EX PARTE HOMER FRANKS; EX PARTE WILLIAM H. PADGETT; EX PARTE FRED REGER; EX PARTE WILLIAM BARBER; EX PARTE FRANK ROBERSON; EX PARTE STANLEY B. PEPLOWSKI; EX PARTE HERMAN BARMORE; EX PARTE KENNETH GERARD; EX PARTE GEORGE D. LATIMER; EX PARTE ERNEST DIEFENBACH; AND EX PARTE JOHN R. MILLER
314 U.S. 578
Supreme Court of the United States (1941)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Ex parte Abernathy, 320 U.S. 219 (U.S. 1943)…582-3. That jurisdiction is discretionary, id. 584; Bowen v. Johnston, 306 U. S. 19, 27, and this Court does not, save in exceptional circumstances, exercise it in cases where an adequate remedy may be had in a lower federal court, Ex parte Current, 314 U. S. 578; Ex parte Spaulding, 317 U. S. 593; Ex parte Hawk, 318 U. S. 746, or, if the relief sought is from the judgment of a state court, where the petitioner has not exhausted his remedies in the state courts, Mooney v. Holohan, 294 U. S. 103, 115; Ex part…