EX PARTE THOMAS M. MCNEILL; EX PARTE JESSIE E. MOORE; EX PARTE SAMUEL WHITE; AND EX PARTE EDWARD CASEBEER

Citator

Cited By

• Park & Tilford, Inc. v. Schulte, 160 F.2d 984 (2d Cir. 1947)
  …wing section 723c. Mack v. Passaic Nat. Bank &Trust Co., 3 Cir., 150 F. 2d 474, 477; United States v. C. M. Lane Lifeboat Co., D.C.E.D.N.Y., 25 F.Supp. 410, affirmed 2 Cir., 118 F. 2d 793, appeal dismissed C. M. Lane Lifeboat Co. v. United States, 314 U.S. 579, 62 S.Ct. 124, 86 L.Ed. 469; 2 Moore’s Federal Practice § 24.07, page 2333. This right may be protected by appeal to this court. United States v. Philips, 8 Cir., 107 F. 824; United States Trust Co. of New York v. Chicago [*989] Terminal Transfer R.…
• Restor-A-Dent Dental Labs., Inc. v. Certified Alloy Prods., Inc., 725 F.2d 871 (2d Cir. 1984)
  …ith Tatum v. Cardillo, 11 F.R.D. 585 (S.D.N.Y.1951) (single contingency of liability in main action); United States v. C.M. Lane Lifeboat Co., Inc., 25 F.Supp. 410 (E.D.N. Y.1938) (same), aff’d, 118 F. 2d 793 (2d Cir.), petition for cert. dismissed, 314 U.S. 579, 62 S.Ct. 124, 86 L.Ed. 469 (1941). . Knapp v. Hankins, 106 F.Supp. 43, 47-48 (E.D.Ill.1952), and Quentin v. Henderson, 110 N.Y.S.2d 561 (N.Y.Sup.Ct.1951), also relied on by appellant, allowed an insurance company to intervene to obtain a declarato…
• Ex parte Texas, 315 U.S. 8 (U.S. 1942)
  …d the Court of Civil Appeals and the litigation could finally have come to an end. Since the opinion of the Texas Supreme Court, on its face, appeared to be susceptible of the construction given it by the petitioners, we issued'a rule to show cause. 314 U. S. 579. In their return, the Chief Justice and Associate Justices of the Supreme Court of Texas state that that court “would have rendered' the same judgment if it had based the same solely upon its 'construction of the State statute and not at all-upon i…