WILLIAMS ET AL.
v.
JACKSONVILLE TERMINAL CO.
WILLIAMS ET AL.
JACKSONVILLE TERMINAL CO.
314 U.S. 590
Supreme Court of the United States (1941)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Thomson v. Gaskill, 315 U.S. 442 (U.S. 1942)…ugh it found the com [*446] plaint “very difficult of analysis,” it had construed it “most favorably to the pleader, for the purpose of passing on the sole question of jurisdiction raised on the appeal.” 119 F. 2d 105, 108. We brought the case here, 314 U. S. 590, in view of the important question affecting the jurisdiction of the district courts. The policy of the statute conferring diversity jurisdiction upon the district courts calls for its strict construction. Healy v. Ratta, 292 U. S. 263, 270; and se…
-
Williams v. Jacksonville Terminal Co., 315 U.S. 386 (U.S. 1942)…e motion, and the Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed. 118 F. 2d 324. Because of the importance of the question whether the tips could be treated as payment of the statutory wage, the petition of the redcaps’ representative for certiorari was granted. 314 U. S. 590. Section 6 of the Act requires every employer to pay each employee engaged in interstate commerce wages at [*391] the prescribed rates per hour.4 Violation of that requirement renders the employer liable for the unpaid wages and for liquidated dama…
-
Hotel & Rest. Emps'. Int'l Alliance v. Wis. Emp. Relations Bd., 315 U.S. 437 (U.S. 1942)…Mr. Justice Frankfurter delivered the opinion of the Court. We brought this case here from the Supreme Court of Wisconsin, 314 U. S. 590, to canvass the claim that Wisconsin has forbidden the petitioners to engage in peaceful [*438] picketing insofar as we have deemed it an exercise of the right of free speech protected by the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Thornhill…