WILLIAMS MANUFACTURING CO.

v.

UNITED SHOE MACHINERY CORP.

Citator

Cited By

• Columbia River Packers Ass'n, Inc. v. Hinton, 315 U.S. 143 (U.S. 1942)
  …tion sought. 34 F. Supp. 970. The Circuit Court of Appeals reversed, holding that a “labor dispute” was involved and that the District Court was therefore without jurisdiction to enjoin. 117 F. 2d 310. To review this question, we granted certiorari. 314 U. S. 600. The petitioner has plants for processing and canning fish in Oregon, Washington, and Alaska. It distributes its products in interstate and foreign commerce. Its supply of fish chiefly depends upon its ability to purchase from independent fishermen…
• Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Elec. Vacuum Cleaner Co., Inc., 315 U.S. 685 (U.S. 1942)
  …eir work was justified because, at the time, a valid closed shop contract, in favor of the Affiliates, under § 8 (3) of the statute, set out below, was in effect.2 Deeming the issues important in the administration of the Act, we granted certiorari. 314 U. S. 600. In addition to the facts just stated, the Board found there was an oral provision, pertaining to a closed shop, included in the 1935 and 1936 contracts. This was to the effect, the Board concluded, that all employees hired after the date of the fi…
• Casey v. United States, 343 U.S. 808 (U.S. 1952)
  …or in our decision, we no longer administer a system of justice under a government of laws. During the same term of Court as Young v. United States, supra, the Government also confessed error in Weber v. United States. The Court granted certiorari, 314 U. S. 600 (1941), heard argument, and affirmed the Court of Appeals judgment by an equally divided Court. 315 U. S. 787 (1942). In Upshaw v. United States, 335 U. S. 410 (1948), the Government had confessed error in the Court oí Appeals for the District of C…