WILLEY ET AL.

v.

MAINE CENTRAL RAILROAD CO.

Citator

Cited By

• Babb v. Schmidt, 496 F.2d 957 (9th Cir. 1974)
  …dealt with Arizona law, both of which deny [*959] premarital creditors of the husband access to the wife’s share of the community. California law is established to be otherwise. In Grolemund v. Cafferata, 17 Cal.2d 679, 111 P. 2d 641, cert. denied, 314 U.S. 612, 62 S.Ct. 87, 86 L.Ed. 492 (1941), it was implied that a wife’s community interest can be reached for satisfaction of the husband’s premarital debts. That such has continued to be the law of the state was made clear in Weinberg v. Weinberg, 67 Cal.2…
• Jess Cancino v. The United States, 451 F.2d 1028 (Ct. Cl. 1971)
  …to the debts of the husband, and no distinction is drawn between a husband’s separate and community debts. See, e. g., Spreckels v. Spreckels, 116 Cal. 339, 48 P. 228 (1897); Grolemund v. Cafferata, 17 Cal.2d 679, 111 P. 2d 641 (1941), cert. denied, 314 U.S. 612, 62 S.Ct. 87, 86 L. Ed. 492; Weinberg v. Weinberg, 67 Cal.2d 557, 63 Cal.Rptr. 13, 432 P. 2d 709 (1967). In Grolemund v. Cafferata, supra, the Supreme Court of California stated: * * * A complete reading of all our code sections on community proper…
• Bonney v. Canadian Nat'l Ry. Co., 800 F.2d 274 (1st Cir. 1986)
  …uty is simply to refrain from “wanton, wilful, or reckless acts.” Robitaille v. Maine Central Railroad Co., 147 Me. 269, 270, 86 A. 2d 386, 387 (1952); see also Willey v. Maine Central Railroad Co., 137 Me. 223, 226, 18 A. 2d 316, 320, cert. denied, 314 U.S. 612, 62 S.Ct. 85, 86 L.Ed.2d 492 (1941); Collins v. Maine Central Railroad Co., 136 Me. 149, 154, 4 A. 2d 100, 103 (1939). The district court ruled that the Railway’s “failure to take anything beyond token measures to prevent injury to pedestrians” evin…