FENZEL, TRUSTEE,

v.

FENSTERWALD ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Sher v. DE Haven, 199 F.2d 777 (D.C. Cir. 1952)
  …he statute seals his lips, and this because the relationship of itself is and ought to be in its nature confidential.” Judge Groner held in Eureka-Maryland Assurance Company v. Gray, 1941, 74 App.D.C. 191, 194, 121 F. 2d 104, 107, certiorari denied 314 U.S. 613, 62 S.Ct. 114, 86 L.Ed. 494, that the trial court correctly rejected hospital records offered by ‘an interne who stated that the information therein came from the patient. He said: “The local statute is’ very broad. It forbids disclosure by the phy…
• The Franklin Life Ins. Co. v. William J. Champion & Co., 353 F.2d 919 (6th Cir. 1965)
  …patient and physician would be directly thwarted by permitting the intern to disclose what the patient had told him; and the statute would be thereby annulled. In Eureka-Maryland Assur. Co. v. Gray, 74 App.D.C. 191, 121 F. 2d 104, 107, cert. denied 314 U.S. 613, 62 S.Ct. 114, 86 L.Ed. 494, the court had occasion to pass upon the statute applicable to the District of Columbia, which was not in the exact language of the Michigan statute providing for the privilege in case of any person duly authorized to pra…