HILLIARD

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (22 total)

• United States v. Young, 470 U.S. 1 (U.S. 1985)
  …) reads as follows: “This rule is a restatement of existing law, Wiborg v. United States, 163 U. S. 632, 658 . . . ; Hemphill v. United States, 112 F. 2d 505, C. C. A. 9th, reversed 312 U. S. 657, . . . conformed to 120 F. 2d 115, certiorari denied 314 U. S. 627 .... Rule 27 of the Rules of the Supreme Court, 28 U. S. C. foil. § 354, provides that errors not specified will be disregarded, 'save as the court, at its option, may notice a plain error not assigned or specified.’ Similar provisions are found in…
• Dirring v. United States, 328 F.2d 512 (1st Cir. 1964)
  …at this outweighed the photograph’s prejudicial effect. Cf. Bram v. United States, 8 Cir., 1955, 226 F. 2d 858; Hardy v. United States, 8 Cir., 1952, 199 F. 2d 704, 706-708; Hilliard v. United States, 4 Cir., 1941, 121 F. 2d 992, 997-998, cert. den. 314 U.S. 627, 62 S.Ct. 111, 86 L.Ed. 503. Defendant was entitled to a limiting instruction if he so desired; he cannot, however, complain where none was asked for. Cf. Reiss v. United States, supra, 324 F. 2d at 683. We agree with the government that the testi…
• Stillman v. United States, 177 F.2d 607 (9th Cir. 1949)
  …s the verdict on each count. The jury weighed the evidence and accepted it as true beyond a reasonable doubt, and since it is supported by sufficient evidence, the verdict binds us. Hemphill v. United States, 9 Cir., 120 F. 2d 115, certiorari denied 314 U.S. 627, 62 S.Ct. 111, 86 L.Ed. 503; Henderson v. United States, 9 Cir., 143 F. 2d 681. Another contention is that the regulations as to the type of records to be kept were too uncertain and indefinite to form the basis of a criminal prosecution; that the…