EASTMAN ET AL.

v.

UNITED STATES ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Scholder v. United States, 428 F.2d 1123 (9th Cir. 1970)
  …not argued that their rights under § 1353 exceed their rights under § 345. . Pierce and Gerard have undercut the sweeping statement in (although perhaps not the holding of) United States v. Eastman (9th Cir.) 118 E.2d 421, 423, cert. denied (1941) 314 U.S. 635, 62 S.Ct. 68, 86 L.Ed. 510, that § 345 authorizes only “suits to compel the making of allotments in the first instance.” The same language is repeated in United States v. Preston (9th Cir. 1965) 352 F. 2d 352, 358, but only as dictum; dismissal ther…
• Fontenelle v. Omaha Tribe OF Nebraska, 430 F.2d 143 (8th Cir. 1970)
  …tes, 375 F. 2d 239 (10th Cir. 1967); United States v. Preston, 352 F. 2d 352 (9th Cir. 1965); Prairie Band of Pottawatomie Tribe of Indians v. Puckkee, 321 F. 2d 767 (10th Cir. 1963); United States v. Eastman, 118 F. 2d 421 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 314 U.S. 635, 62 S.Ct. 68, 86 L.Ed. 510 (1941). The Supreme Court recognized in making the distinction that “judicial examination” would be necessary to separate right from policy. Arenas v. United States, supra, 322 U.S.. at 432, 64 S.Ct. 1090. Examination con…
• Mitchell v. The United States, 591 F.2d 1300 (Ct. Cl. 1979)
  …nab v. Hitchcock, 202 U.S. 473, 475-76, 26 S.Ct. 667, 50 L.Ed. 1113 (1906); Affiliated Ute Citizens v. United States, 406 U.S. 128, 141-43, 92 S.Ct. 1456, 31 L.Ed.2d 741 (1972); United States v. Eastman, 118 F. 2d 421, 423, (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 314 U.S. 635, 62 S.Ct. 68, 86 L.Ed. 510 (1941); Harkins v. United States, 375 F. 2d 239, 240-42 (10th Cir. 1967); Twin Cities Chippewa Tribal Council v. Minnesota Chippewa Tribe, 370 F. 2d 529, 531-32 (8th Cir. 1967); Motah v. United States, 402 F. 2d 1, 2 (10th…