PITCAIRN ET AL., RECEIVERS,

v.

WILD

Citator

Cited By (16 total)

• Nesbitt v. Cmty. Health OF S. Dade, Inc., 467 So. 2d 711 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985)
  …be qualified by a cautionary instruction to the jury that the evidence does not by itself establish a standard of care. 1 J. Wigmore, Evidence § 461 (2d ed. 1923). See Brigham Young University v. Lillywhite, 118 F. 2d 836 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 314 U.S. 638, 62 S.Ct. 73, 86 L.Ed. 512 (1941); Hellweg v. Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co., 110 F. 2d 546 (D.C.Cir.1940). The general rule that evidence of custom bearing on the fact of negligence is admissible is, of course, subject to principles of relevanc…
• Roberson v. Duval Cnty. Sch. Bd., 618 So. 2d 360 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993)
  …be qualified by a cautionary instruction to the jury that the evidence does not by itself establish a standard of care. 1 J. Wigmore, Evidence § 461 (2d ed. 1923). See Brigham Young University v. Lillywhite, 118 F. 2d 836 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 314 U.S. 638, 62 S.Ct. 73, 86 L.Ed. 512 (1941); Hellweg v. Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co., 110 F. 2d 546 (D.C.Cir.1940). The general rule that evidence of custom bearing on the fact of negligence is admissible is, of course, subject to principles of relevanc…
• E. L. Farmer & Co. v. Hooks, 239 F.2d 547 (10th Cir. 1956)
  …testimony rests largely in the discretion of the trial court; and when exercised within normal limits, such discretion will not be disturbed on appeal. Brigham Young University v. Lillywhite, 10 Cir., 118 F. 2d 836,137 A.L.R. 598, certiorari denied 314 U.S. 638, 62 S.Ct. 73, 86 L.Ed. 512; Schillie v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co., 8 Cir., 222 F. 2d 810. It is enough to say without laboring the question that we think there was no abuse of discretion in admitting the testimony in question. One gro…