POWELL ET AL., RECEIVERS,

v.

WIGGINS

Citator

Cited By

• Beanland v. Chicago, 480 F.2d 109 (8th Cir. 1973)
  …F. 2d 745, 748 (2nd Cir. 1970); Carter v. Atlanta & St. Andrews Bay Ry., 170 F. 2d 719, 721 (5th Cir. 1948), rev’d on other grounds, 338 U.S. 430, 70 S.Ct. 226, 94 L.Ed. 236 (1949); Wiggins v. Powell, 119 F. 2d 751, 753-754 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 314 U.S. 649, 62 S.Ct. 94, 86 L. Ed. 520 (1941); Finnegan v. Missouri Pac. Ry., 261 Mo. 481, 169 S.W. 969, 974 (1914). Also, competent expert testimony is generally admissible in cases involving the operations of a railroad which necessarily involve facts peculi…
• O'Hara v. Oakland Cnty., 136 F.2d 152 (6th Cir. 1943)
  …that we were bound by the decree of the Michigan Supreme Court and dismissed the bill. After a petition for rehearing was denied the bondholders committee applied to the Supreme Court of the United States for a writ of certiorari, which was denied, 314 U.S. 649, 62 S.Ct. 95, 86 L.Ed. 521. Thereafter, the committee applied for a rehearing, which was passed by the Supreme Court until the determination by the Supreme Court of Michigan of whether the Michigan drainage law was as interpreted by us. The Michigan…
• Clair D. Knierim v. Erie Lackawanna R.R. Co., 424 F.2d 745 (2d Cir. 1970)
  …he operating rules and to question any departure by superiors or fellow employees. This testimony was sufficient to establish the “customary and practical construction” of the rule. See Wiggins v. Powell, 119 F. 2d 751, 753 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 314 U.S. 649, 62 S.Ct. 94, 86 L.Ed. 520 (1941). Finally, the Railroad contends that the trial court abused its discretion in denying the Railroad’s motion for a new trial on the ground that the verdicts were excessive. The medical evidence introduced at trial a…