EHRMAN ET AL.

v.

COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE

Citator

Cited By (20 total)

• Smolowe v. Delendo Corp., 136 F.2d 231 (2d Cir. 1943)
  …l penalty against the wrongdoer. While the allowance made here was quite substantial, we are not disposed to interfere with the district court’s well-considered determination. Cf. May v. Midwest Refining Co., 1 Cir., 121 F. 2d 431, certiorari denied 314 U.S. 668, 62 S.Ct. 129, 86 L.Ed. 534. Since in many cases such as this the possibility of recovering attorney’s fees will provide the sole stimulus for the enforcement of § 16(b), the allowance must not be too niggardly. Cf. Murphy v. North American Light &…
• Friedman v. The United States, 310 F.2d 381 (Ct. Cl. 1962)
  …n. The Accounting Office is not normally a deciding tribunal. But cf. Thomson v. United States, 79 Ct.Cl. 224, 226-227, for a special statute requiring resort to that agency. . See, also, Tserioni v. United States, 94 Ct.Cl. 142, 147, cert. denied, 314 U.S. 668, 62 S.Ct. 129, 86 L.Ed. 535; Utah Power & Light Co. v. United States, 67 Ct.Cl. 602, 606; King v. United States, 48 Ct.Cl. 371, 375. . See, e. g., Battelle v. United States, 7 Ct.Cl. 297; Carlisle v. United States, 29 Ct.Cl. 414; Curtis v. United S…
• Charles of the Ritz Distribs. Corp. v. Fed. Trade Comm'n, 143 F.2d 676 (2d Cir. 1944)
  …aboratories, Inc., v. Federal Trade Commission, supra; Aronberg v. Federal Trade Commission, supra; Federal Trade Commission v. Standard Education Soc., supra; Ford Motor Co. v. Federal Trade Commission, 6 Cir., 120 F. 2d 175, 182, certiorari denied 314 U.S. 668, 62 S.Ct. 130, 86 L.Ed. 535; Newton Tea & Spice Co. v. United States, 6 Cir., 288 F. 475, 479. And, while the wise and the worldly may well realize the falsity of any representations that the present product can roll back the years, there remains “t…