FITZGERALD, TRUSTEE,

v.

GULF REFINING CO.; FITZGERALD, TRUSTEE, V. HUMBLE OIL & REFINING CO.; FITZGERALD, TRUSTEE, V. SHELL OIL CO., INC.; FITZGERALD, TRUSTEE, V. FREEPORT SULPHUR CO.; FITZGERALD, TRUSTEE, V. COCKRELL; FITZGERALD, TRUSTEE, V. GULF REFINING CO. OF LOUISIANA ET AL.; AND FITZGERALD, TRUSTEE, V. COCKRELL ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (12 total)

• Goldman v. United States, 316 U.S. 129 (U.S. 1942)
• Bakery & Pastry Drivers & Helpers Local 802 OF THE Int'l Bhd. OF Teamsters v. Wohl, 315 U.S. 769 (U.S. 1942)
  …The Court of Appeals later certified that such question had been passed upon, a petition for rehearing was granted, the writ of certiorari granted, and the judgment summarily reversed. 313 U. S. 548. We later granted another petition for rehearing, 314 U. S. 701, and have since heard argument. The controversy in the trial court centered about the issue as to whether a labor dispute was involved within the meaning of New York statutes. The trial court found itself constrained to hold that no labor dispute w…
• Williams v. Jacksonville Terminal Co., 315 U.S. 386 (U.S. 1942)
  …employer, he gave judgment in favor of the redcaps. The Circuit Court of Appeals reversed, 118 F. 2d 328, and certiorari was denied. 313 U. S. 591. Because of the importance of the issues presented, on petition for rehearing certiorari was granted. 314 U. S. 701. Since the basic elements of Pickett’s case are no longer in dispute, the crucial issue again is whether the minimum wages were paid. It was shown that, after the I. C. C. ruling that redcaps were employees, the redcaps notified the Dallas terminal…