CANTOR ET AL.

v.

GOVERNOR CLINTON CO., INC.

Citator

Cited By

• Exhibit Supply Co. v. Ace Patents Corp., 315 U.S. 126 (U.S. 1942)
  …hree suits were consolidated and tried together. Upon full consideration of the issues the District Court and the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit held Claim 4 of the patent valid and infringed. 119 F. 2d 349. We granted certiorari, 314 U. S. 702, on a petition which challenged only the decree of infringement below, on the ground that it enlarged the scope of the patent as defined by the claim, by resort to the doctrine of equivalents, and that Nelson, the patentee, by the amendment of his c…
• United States v. Nunnally Inv. Co., 316 U.S. 258 (U.S. 1942)
  …ve judgment for the respondent. 36 F. Supp. 332. In view of the importance of this question in the administration of the federal income tax law and its relation to the decision in Moore Ice Cream Co. v. Rose, 289 U. S. 373, we brought the case here. 314 U. S. 702. Nearly a quarter-century ago in Sage v. United States, 250 U. S. 33, this Court upon full consideration announced the doctrine that the United States is a “stranger” to a judgment resulting from a suit brought against a collector, and that such a…
• Amstar Corp. & Enviro-Clear Co., Inc. v. Envirotech Corp. & Energy Fuels Nuclear, Inc., 823 F.2d 1538 (Fed. Cir. 1987)
  …ntitled to enjoin their use. Stickle v. Heublein, Inc., 716 F. 2d 1550, 1563, 219 U.S.P.Q. 377, 386 (Fed.Cir.1983); Wagner Sign Serv., Inc. v. Midwest News Reel Theatres, Inc., 119 F. 2d 929, 930, 49 U.S.P.Q. 287, 288-89 (7th Cir.), cert. dismissed, 314 U.S. 702, 62 S.Ct. 50, 86 L.Ed. 562 (1941); see King Instrument Corp. v. Otari Corp., 814 F. 2d 1560, 1564, 2 U.S.P.Q.2d 1201, 1204 (Fed.Cir.1987). Amstar argues, however, that it is entitled to an injunction because it has received no money yet; Envirotech…