MARTIN M. GOLDMAN
v.
UNITED STATES; SHULMAN V. UNITED STATES; AND THEODORE GOLDMAN V. UNITED STATES

U.S. | 1941-10-20
Nos. 962; No. 963; No. 980
Mr. Justice Jackson took no part in the consideration and decision of this application.
314 U.S. 704 Supreme Court of the United States (1941) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Topics
Petition For Rehearing Writ Of Certiorari

Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Petition For Rehearing cases and more on FLexlaw

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Biggers v. Neil, 448 F.2d 91 (6th Cir. 1971)
    …issue has come before the court in other eases still pending” is a common ground for grant of rehearing. Stern and Gressman, Supreme Court Practice, 3rd Ed. 389; see Pickett v. Union Terminal Co., 313 U.S. 591 [61 S.Ct. 1115, 85 L.Ed. 1546] (1941) ; 314 U.S. 704 [62 S.Ct. 55, 86 L.Ed. 563] (1941); 315 U.S. 386, 389, 394 [62 S.Ct. 659, 86 L.Ed. 914] (1942) . It is plainly appropriate and just that the results in these two eases conform. Unless it is beyond doubt that principles announced in Foster will not b…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw