CHRYSLER CORPORATION ET AL.

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (12 total)

• Ford Motor Co. v. United States, 335 U.S. 303 (U.S. 1948)
  …S. 618, rehearing denied, 314 U. S. 710; United States v. General Motors Corp., 2 F. R. D. 346 (N. D. Ill.); United States v. General Motors Corp., 2 F. R. D. 528 (N. D. Ill.); Chrysler Corp. v. United States, 314 U. S. 583, [*306] rehearing denied, 314 U. S. 716; Chrysler Corp. v. United States, 316 U. S. 556. An analytical summary of this litigation will make clear the immediate issues before us and, indeed, largely dispose of them. On May 27, 1938, indictments were returned in the District Court of the U…
• Chrysler Corp. v. United States, 316 U.S. 556 (U.S. 1942)
  …ng the date as requested. Chrysler appealed to this Court from the order of modification, but the appeal was dismissed on December 8, 1941 for want of a quorum of Justices qualified to sit, 314 U. S. 583, and on January 5, 1942 rehearing was denied, 314 U. S. 716. Pursuant to additional stipulations between the Government and General Motors, the time to answer the Government’s complaint in the civil suit in the Illinois District Court was successively extended to January 27, 1941, to May 1, 1941, to June 15…
• United States v. Kirk, 528 F.2d 1057 (5th Cir. 1976)
  …ident, or Vice President-elect, shall be fined not more than $1,000 or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.” . Weiss v. United States, 5 Cir. 1941, 122 F. 2d 675, 682, cert. denied 314 U.S. 687, 62 S.Ct. 300, 86 L.Ed. 550, rehearing denied 314 U.S. 716, 62 S.Ct. 478, 86 L.Ed. 570. See also Rule 404(b), Federal Rules of Evidence (1975). Professor Wigmore finds that the rationale for this exception is based on the doctrine of chance. Juries are to be allowed to make the logical inference that succes…