NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
v.
AUTOMOTIVE MAINTENANCE MACHINERY CO.

U.S. | 1942-02-16
No. 188
Mr. Justice Jackson took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
315 U.S. 282 Supreme Court of the United States (1942) Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 86 L. Ed. 848 · 62 S. Ct. 608 · SCDB 1941-079 · 1942 U.S. LEXIS 1159
Cited by 49 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

Upon examination of the record, the Court concludes that the Board’s findings are supported by substantial evidence. Labor Board v. Link-Belt Co., 311 U. S. 584; Westinghouse Electric & Mfg. Co. v. Labor Board, 312 U. S. 660. The judgment is therefore reversed with directions to enforce the Board’s order in full, but with the modification proposed by the Board to conform to the decision in Republic Steel Corp. v. Labor Board, 311 U. S. 7. The Chief Justice and Mr. Justice Roberts are of opinion that the order as modified should be enforced except with respect to the alleged discriminatory discharges of Warner, Jr., and Jordan, which they think are without the support of substantial evidence.

Reversed.

Mr. Justice Jackson took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By (32 total)

  • In re Est. of Edward Biederman v. Cheatham, 161 So. 2d 538 (Fla. 2d DCA 1964)
    …ury v. Mandeville, 7 Cir. 1942, 130 E.2d 208, reversed on another question in Mandeville v. Canterbury, 1943, 318 U.S. 47, 63 S.Ct. 472, 87 L.Ed. 605. . 1 Bowe-Parker: Page on Wills, § 3.2 et seq. . Riley v. New York Trust Co., 1942, 315 U.S. 343, 62 S.Ct. 608, 86 L.Ed. 885; Loewentkal v. Mandell, 1936, 125 Fla. 685, 170 So. 169. . Burbank v. Ernst, 1914, 232 U.S. 162, 34 S.Ct. 299, 58 L.Ed. 551. . Riley v. New York Trust Co., supra, note 4. . Murpby v. Murphy, 1936, 125 Fla. 855, 170 So. 856; and see…
  • Miller v. Nelson, 160 Fla. 410 (Fla. 1948)
    …arren, 73 Fla. [*421] 764; 75 So. 35, L.R.A. 1917E 490; Gipson v. Gipson, 151 Fla. 587, 10 So. (2nd) 82, and similar cases. See Texas v. Florida, 306 U.S. 398, 59 S. Ct. 563, 83 L. Ed. 817, 121 A.L.R. 1179, Riley v. New York Trust Co., 315 U.S. 343, 62 S. Ct. 608, 86 L. Ed. 885 Pertinent language of the order of dismissal is viz: “and having carefully considered the petitions filed, and each and every of the answers filed, the testimony and exhibits, and after a due consideration thereof, finds that Olof Ze…
  • SCG Travel, Inc. v. Westminster Fin. Corp., 583 So. 2d 723 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991)
    …atute, 28 U.S.C. section 1738, which require every state to give the same effect to judicial proceedings as the rendering state gives them. Durfee v. Duke, 375 U.S. 106, 84 S.Ct. 242, 11 L.Ed.2d 186 (1963); Riley v. New York Trust Co., 315 U.S. 343, 62 S.Ct. 608, 86 L.Ed. 885 (1942). The purpose of the uniform act — and equally, we think, of the Florida version— is to provide a speedy and economical method of enforcing a foreign judgment without the further cost and harassment often incurred when an entire…

Previewing 3 of 32 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw