RODIEK, ANCILLARY EXECUTOR,

v.

UNITED STATES ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (16 total)

• AGB OIL Co. v. Crystal Exploration & Prod. Co., 406 So. 2d 1165 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981)
  …F. 2d 541 (10th Cir. 1945), cert. denied, 328 U.S. 840, 66 S.Ct. 1011, 90 L.Ed. 1615 (1946); Kithcart v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co., 119 F. 2d 497 (8th Cir. 1941), cert. denied sub nom., United States ex rel. Kithcart v. Gardner, 315 U.S. 808, 62 S.Ct. 793, 86 L.Ed. 1207 (1942); Reeves v. Hutson, 144 Cal.App.2d 445, 301 P. 2d 264 (1956); Kamp Implement Co. v. Amsterdam Lumber, Inc., 166 Mont. 435, 533 P. 2d 1072 (1975); Wilson-Harris v. Southwest Telephone Co., 193 Okl. 194, 141 P. 2d 986 (1943); Bret…
• United States v. Silliman, 167 F.2d 607 (3d Cir. 1948)
  …ey already paid out if such payments were induced by fraudulent statements. Isenberg v. Biddle, 1941, 75 U.S.App.D.C. 100, 125 F. 2d 741; cf. United States v. Rodiek, 2 Cir., 1941, 117 F. 2d 588, aff’d by an equally divided court 1942, 315 U.S. 783, 62 S.Ct. 793, 86 L.Ed. 1190; Cummings v. Societe Suisse Pour Valeurs de Metaux, 1936, 66 App.D.C. 121, 85 F. 2d 287. Implicit in these cases is the holding that such fraud gives rise to a cause of action for, unless it did, there would be no foundation on which…

  ← 1 / 5 →
• In re Halpern v. Bankruptcy, 426 F.2d 102 (2d Cir. 1970)
  …ey, 266 U.S. 511, 517, 45 S.Ct. 145, 69 L.Ed. 413 (1925); Fibreboard Paper Products Corp. v. East Bay Union of Machinists, Local 1304, 344 F. 2d 300, 306 (9 Cir. 1965); United States v. Rodiek, 117 F. 2d 588, 593 (2d Cir. 1941), aff’d, 315 U.S. 783, 62 S.Ct. 793, 86 L. Ed. 1190 (1942); Restatement of the Law of Judgments § 68, Comment o (1942); IB Moore, Federal Practice 0.443[5] at 3919 (1965). The reason for this rule is twofold. First, the decision on an issue not essential to the prior judgment may not…