CENTERS
v.
SANFORD, WARDEN
CENTERS
SANFORD, WARDEN
315 U.S. 784
Supreme Court of the United States (1942)
Negative Treatment
Cited by 9 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam:
Upon consent of the Government, the judgment below is vacated and the case is remanded to the District Court with permission to both parties to reopen the case for the purpose of taking further evidence with respect to all issues in the case, and for findings on those issues, including whether petitioner consulted with appointed counsel, whether sueh counsel appeared in court with him, or whether he waived such consultation or appearance, and whether he understood the charge to which he pleaded guilty.
Mr. Paul Crutch-field, with whom Mr. Augustus M. Roan was on the brief, for petitioner. Mr. Herbert Wechsler argued the. cause, and Assistant Attorney General Berge and Messrs. War-, ner W. Gardner and W. Marvin Smith were on the brief, for respondent.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Okla. Press Publ'g Co. v. Walling, 327 U.S. 186 (U.S. 1946)…rd & Co., 114 F. 2d 384 (C. C. A. 7); Walling v. Benson, 137 F. 2d 501 (C. C. A. 8). See Part IV. See also Sun Publishing Co. v. Walling, 140 F. 2d 445; Fleming v. Lowell Sun Co., 36 F. Supp. 320, rev’d on other grounds, 120 F. 2d 213, affirmed, 315 U. S. 784. No question is presented whether Congress could enforce its mandate by excluding from commerce the circulation of a publisher refusing to conform. Cf. Sun Publishing Co. v. Walling, 140 F. 2d 445, 449. Since the Fifth Amendment, unlike the Fourte…
-
Williams v. Huff, 142 F.2d 91 (D.C. Cir. 1944)…U.S. 333, 43 S.Ct. 555, 67 L.Ed. 1009; Walker v. Johnston, 312 U.S. 275, 284, 61 S.Ct. 574, 85 L.Ed. 830; Clawans v. Rives, 70 App.D.C. 107, 109, 104 F. 2d 240, 122 A.L.R. 1436. We do not understand these cases to be overruled by Centers v. Sanford, 315 U.S. 784, 62 S.Ct. 802, 86 L.Ed. 1190. Johnson v. Zerbst, 304 U.S. 458, 468, 58 S.Ct. 1019, 1024, 82 L.Ed. 1461, 146 A.L.R. 357; United States ex rel. McCann v. Adams, 320 U.S. 220, 64 S.Ct. 14. Walker v. Johnston, 312 U.S. 275, 61 S.Ct. 574, 85 L.Ed. 830;…
-
Clarke v. United States, 915 F.2d 699 (D.C. Cir. 1990)…avigation Co. v. United States, 825 F. 2d 502 (D.C.Cir.1987). The Supreme Court has also vacated its own decision when a case became moot after the decision issued but before its disposition of a petition for rehearing. Stewart v. Southern Ry. Co., 315 U.S. 784, 62 S.Ct. 801, 86 L.Ed. 1190, vacating as moot 315 U.S. 283, 62 S.Ct. 616, 86 L.Ed. 849 (1942). Again the courts of appeals have pursued a parallel course. Thus in United States v. Caraway, 483 F. 2d 215 (5th Cir.1973), the court en banc vacated a p…1 / 2
Previewing 3 of 9 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence