SKIDMORE
v.
UNITED STATES
SKIDMORE
UNITED STATES
315 U.S. 800
Supreme Court of the United States (1942)
Caution
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Sec. & Exch. Comm'n v. Arthur Young & Co., 584 F.2d 1018 (D.C. Cir. 1978)…e Law Treatise § 3.03 (1958). . See In re SEC, 84 F. 2d 316, 318 (2d Cir.), rev’d and vacated as moot sub nom. Bracken v. SEC, 299 U.S. 504, 57 S.Ct. 18, 81 L.Ed. 374 (1936); Boehm v. United States, 123 F. 2d 791, 808 (8th Cir. 1941), cert. denied, 315 U.S. 800, 62 S.Ct. 794, 86 L.Ed. 1223 (1942); Consolidated Mines v. SEC, 97 F. 2d 704, 708 (9th Cir. 1938); SEC v. First Security Bank, 447 F. 2d 166, 168 (10th Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 1038, 92 S.Ct. 710, 30 L.Ed.2d 729 (1972). . See text supra a…
-
United States v. Panczko, 429 F.2d 683 (7th Cir. 1970)…stion before us. I. The question and the answer it elicited had no proper place in the government’s case in chief. The relevant facts here are far different from those in United States v. Skidmore, 123 F. 2d 604, 608 (7th Cir. 1941), cert. denied, 315 U.S. 800, 62 S.Ct. 626, 86 L.Ed. 1201 (1942), which the government cites to justify the question and answer. Panczko’s prior record was no element of the charges against him. And he was not a witness and the prior conviction was not used as impeaching materi…