SKIDMORE
v.
UNITED STATES

U.S. | 1942-02-02
No. 813
315 U.S. 800 Supreme Court of the United States (1942) Caution
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Sec. & Exch. Comm'n v. Arthur Young & Co., 584 F.2d 1018 (D.C. Cir. 1978)
    …e Law Treatise § 3.03 (1958). . See In re SEC, 84 F. 2d 316, 318 (2d Cir.), rev’d and vacated as moot sub nom. Bracken v. SEC, 299 U.S. 504, 57 S.Ct. 18, 81 L.Ed. 374 (1936); Boehm v. United States, 123 F. 2d 791, 808 (8th Cir. 1941), cert. denied, 315 U.S. 800, 62 S.Ct. 794, 86 L.Ed. 1223 (1942); Consolidated Mines v. SEC, 97 F. 2d 704, 708 (9th Cir. 1938); SEC v. First Security Bank, 447 F. 2d 166, 168 (10th Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 1038, 92 S.Ct. 710, 30 L.Ed.2d 729 (1972). . See text supra a…
  • United States v. Panczko, 429 F.2d 683 (7th Cir. 1970)
    …stion before us. I. The question and the answer it elicited had no proper place in the government’s case in chief. The relevant facts here are far different from those in United States v. Skidmore, 123 F. 2d 604, 608 (7th Cir. 1941), cert. denied, 315 U.S. 800, 62 S.Ct. 626, 86 L.Ed. 1201 (1942), which the government cites to justify the question and answer. Panczko’s prior record was no element of the charges against him. And he was not a witness and the prior conviction was not used as impeaching materi…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw