J. A. ZACHARIASSEN & CO.
v.
UNITED STATES
J. A. ZACHARIASSEN & CO.
UNITED STATES
315 U.S. 815
Supreme Court of the United States (1942)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Buder v. Fiske, 174 F.2d 260 (8th Cir. 1949)…the three cases involving the Liggett estate. McIntosh v. Wiggins, 354 Mo. 747, 191 S.W. 2d 637, certiorari denied 328 U.S. 839, 66 S.Ct. 1015, 90 L.Ed. 1614; Id., 356 Mo. 926, 204 S.W. 2d 770; Id, 8 Cir, 123 F. 2d 316, this Court, certiorari denied 315 U.S. 815, 62 S.Ct. 800, 86 L.Ed. 1213, and Southern Railway Co. v. Glenn’s Adm’r, 102 Va. 529, 46 S.E. 776. The three McIntosh cases were different phases of a contest between a life tenant and a remainderman over title to property. This property had devolv…1 / 3
-
D. M. W. Contracting Co., Inc. v. Stolz, 158 F.2d 405 (D.C. Cir. 1946)…ce already presented. Affirmed. Rule 53 (a) provides: “As used in these rules the word ‘master’ includes a referee, an auditor, and an examiner.” In Re Mifflin Chemical Corporation, 3 Cir., 123 F. 2d 311, certiorari denied Sheridan v. Rothensies, 315 U.S. 815, 62 S.Ct. 804, 86 L.Ed. 1213; In Re Philpott, D.C., 37 F.Supp. 43. Appellants were given every reasonable opportunity all through the trial below to produce competent evidence but failed to do so. Frank Adam Electric Co. v. Colt’s Patent Fire Arms…