MINNESOTA MINING & MANUFACTURING CO.

v.

COE, COMMISSIONER OF PATENTS

Citator

Cited By (13 total)

• United States & Preston Smith v. Marchese, 341 F.2d 782 (9th Cir. 1965)
  …ation that goes with, and is an integral part of crime, seemingly a necessary part of crime’s solution and prosecution and ultimate control, if not prevention. Lisenba v. California, 314 U. S. 219, 62 S.Ct. 280, 86 L.Ed. 166 (1941), rehearing denied 315 U.S. 826, 62 S.Ct. 620, 86 L.Ed. 1222 (1942); United States v. Vita, 209 F.Supp. 172 (E.D. N.Y.1962). We turn to the third question under consideration — the prosecutor’s duty under the circumstances of this case. To fairly consider this, we must reconstru…
• Roche Prods., Inc. v. Bolar Pharm. Co., Inc., 733 F.2d 858 (Fed. Cir. 1984)
  …cially courts of equity, may appropriately withhold their aid where the plaintiff is using the right asserted contrary to the public interest,” Morton Salt Co. v. Suppiger Co., 314 U.S. 488, 492, 62 S.Ct. 402, 405, 86 L.Ed. 363 (1941), reh’g denied, 315 U.S. 826, 62 S.Ct. 620, 86 L.Ed. 1222 (1942). Since “the standards of [*866] the public interest, not the requirements of private litigation, measure the propriety and need for injunctive relief in these cases,” Hecht Co. v. Bowles, 321 U.S. 321, 331, 64 S…
• United States v. Mills, 366 F.2d 512 (6th Cir. 1966)
  …s, 295 U-S. 78, 82, 55 S.Ct. 629, 79 L.Ed. 1314; or where it involves no element of surprise prejudicial to the efforts of the defendant to prepare his defense, United States v. Ragen, 314 U.S. 513, 526, 62 S.Ct. 374, 86 L.Ed. 383, rehearing denied, 315 U.S. 826, 62 S.Ct. 620, 86 L.Ed. 1222; or where it does not affect substantial rights. Rule 52(a), F.R. of Crim.P.; cf. United States v. Haskins, 345 F. 2d 111, 114 (C.A.6). “Whether or not a variance is prejudicial is a judgment that must be made on the fac…