EX PARTE MARTIN WOHL ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• C. J. Hendry Co. v. Moore, 318 U.S. 133 (U.S. 1943)
  …deral courts by the Judiciary Act and hence was properly tried in the state court. Cf. Knapp, Stout & Co. v. McCaffrey, 177 U. S. 638; The Hamilton, 207 U. S. 398, 404; Red Cross Line v. Atlantic Fruit Co., 264 U. S. 109, 123. We granted certiorari, 316 U. S. 643, the question being of importance in defining the jurisdiction of state courts in relation to the admiralty jurisdiction. Only a single issue is presented by the record and briefs — whether the state is precluded by the Constitution and laws of the…
• United States Fid. & Guar. Co. v. United States, 201 F.2d 118 (10th Cir. 1952)
  …ted and withheld by the employer, and that under the surety bond, on default by said employer Kendrick Electric Inc., the surety, plaintiff herein, became liable for the payment of such withholding taxes.” . United States v. New York, 315 U.S. 510, 316 U.S. 643, 62 S.Ct. 712, 86 L.Ed. 998. . Congressional Record. Volume 79, Page 13, 382. . Glenn v. American Surety Co., 6 Cir., 160 F. 2d 977; New York Casualty Co. v. Zwerner, D.C., 58 F.Supp. 473; Farmers’ Bank v. Hayes, 6 Cir., 58 F. 2d 34; Prairie State…
• Benjamin B. Brown in Bankr. for Amco Millwork & Lumber Co., Inc. v. Collector OF Taxes FOR the Dist. OF Columbia, 247 F.2d 786 (D.C. Cir. 1957)
  …hereinafter discussed. State of New Jersey v. Anderson, 1906, 203 U.S. 483, 492, 27 S.Ct. 137, 51 L.Ed. 284; City of New York v. Feiring, 1941, 313 U.S. 283, 285, 61 S.Ct. 1028, 85 L.Ed. 1333; United States v. State of New York, 1942, 315 U.S. 510, 316 U.S. 643, 62 S.Ct. 712, 86 L.Ed. 998. . 30 Stat. 565 (1898), as amended, 11 U.S.C.A. § 110. . Swarts v. Hammer, 1904, 194 U.S. 441, 444, 24 S.Ct. 695, 696, 48 L.Ed. 1060. . Swarts v. Hammer, supra note 11; 3 Collier on Bankruptcy K 62.14, at 1514 (14th ed…