PARKER ET AL.

v.

ILLINOIS

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Bryant, 671 F.2d 450 (11th Cir. 1982)
  …, eg., Marchese v. United States, 126 F. 2d 671, 675 (5th Cir. 1942) (vessels which are available for use in foreign commerce come within statute despite current inactivity); Bersio v. United States, 124 F. 2d 310, 313 (4th Cir. 1941), cert. denied, 316 U.S. 665, 62 S.Ct. 1033, 86 L.Ed. 1742 (1942) (the original purpose of the statute was to protect “the foreign commerce of the country and vessels usable as instrumentalities of that commerce (emphasis added); United States v. Martini, 42 F.Supp. 502, 509 (S…
• United States v. Motto Franicevich, 465 F.2d 467 (5th Cir. 1972)
  …Va.1941, 41 F.Supp. 21, 26, et seq., and United States v. Martini, S.D.Ala.1941, 42 F.Supp. 502, 510. However, the Fourth, Fifth, Third and First Circuits have decided differently. In Bersio v. United States, 4 Cir. 1941, 124 F. 2d 310, cert. denied 316 U.S. 665, 666, 62 S.Ct. 1033, 86 L.Ed. 1742, Judge Parker said in part: “The question then comes down to this: Was the evidence sufficient to establish intent ‘to injure or endanger the safety of the vessel’? We think that it was. In this connection, we thi…
• Stiegele v. J. M. Moore Import-Export Co., Inc., 312 F.2d 588 (2d Cir. 1963)
  …ions. Schriber-Schroth Co. v. Cleveland Trust Co., 311 U.S. 211, 61 S.Ct. 235, 85 L.Ed. 132 (1940), opinion amended, 312 U.S. 654, 61 S.Ct. 235, 85 L.Ed. 132 (1941); Tampax, Inc. v. Personal Products Corp., 123 F. 2d 722 (2 Cir. 1941), cert. denied, 316 U.S. 665, 62 S.Ct. 946, 86 L.Ed. 1741 (1942) ; D & H Electric Co., supra. There is no estoppel here. The file wrapper unequivocally demonstrates that throughout the proceedings in the Patent Office the patentee made two distinct claims; one including no mea…