WARD

v.

STATE OF NEW YORK

Citator

Cited By

• Feguer v. United States, 302 F.2d 214 (8th Cir. 1962)
  …s 304 U.S. 458, 58 S.Ct. 1019, 82 L.Ed. 1461. But it has been observed, too, that this right does not necessarily include the payment by the government of the expenses of witnesses. Casebeer v. Hudspeth, 10 Cir., 1941, 121 F. 2d 914, 916, cert. den. 316 U.S. 683, 62 S.Ct. 1272, 86 L.Ed. 1755; Neufield v. United States, 1941, 73 App.D.C. 174, 118 F. 2d 375, 385, cert. den. sub. nom. Ruben v. United States, 315 U.S. 798, 62 S.Ct. 580, 86 L.Ed. 1199; Wallace v. Hunter, 10 Cir., 1945, 149 F. 2d 59, 61; Brewer v…
• Curran v. State OF Del., 259 F.2d 707 (3d Cir. 1958)
  …officers. See United States v. Spadafora, 7 Cir., 1952, 200 F. 2d 140; Wild v. State of Oklahoma, 10 Cir., 1951, 187 F. 2d 409; Tilghman v. Hunter, 10 Cir., 1948, 167 F. 2d 661; Casebeer v. Hudspeth, 10 Cir., 121 F. 2d 914, certiorari denied, 1941, 316 U.S. 683, 62 S.Ct. 1272, 86 L.Ed. 1755, rehearing denied, 1942, 317 U.S. 704, 63 S.Ct. 23, 87 L.Ed. 562. Without further interpretation of the Mooney decision, we conclude that this issue has been settled by Pyle v. State of Kansas, 1942, 317 U.S. 213, 63 S.…
• Johnson v. United States, 333 F.2d 371 (10th Cir. 1964)
  …at Springfield, on this record, we cannot say that the trial Court’s failure to require the attendance of Dr. Weiland, if indeed he was specifically requested, was an abuse of discretion. See: Casebeer v. Hudspeth (10 CA), 121 F. 2d 914, cert. den. 316 U.S. 683, 62 S.Ct. 1272, 86 L.Ed. 1755. Appellant seems to argue that since a former indictment charging him with the same offense, resulted in his confinement in mental institutions for more than one year before his trial, he was unconstitutionally denied…