GLOVER
v.
UNITED STATES
GLOVER
UNITED STATES
316 U.S. 690
Supreme Court of the United States (1942)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Safeco Ins. Co. OF Am. v. Guyton, 692 F.2d 551 (9th Cir. 1982)…law must follow the most recent decisions of the highest court of the state. See Vandenbark v. Owens-Illinois Glass Co., 311 U.S. 538, 61 S.Ct. 347, 85 L.Ed. 327 (1941); Toole County Irrigation Dist. v. Moody, 125 F. 2d 498 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 316 U.S. 690, 62 S.Ct. 1281, 86 L.Ed. 1762, reh. denied, 317 U.S. 704, 63 S.Ct. 24, 87 L.Ed. 562 (1942). . See State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Partridge, 10 Cal.3d 94, 514 P. 2d 123, 109 Cal.Rptr. 811 (1973) (insured negligently files down gun tri…
-
Deaver v. United States (D.D.C. 1946)…he mails the offense. The scheme need not be practical or successful in the sense that its perpetrators reap a harvest. The damage calculated to result may be large or small. See Glover v. United States, 5 Cir., 125 F. 2d 291, 293, certiorari denied 316 U.S. 690, 62 S.Ct 1280, 86 L.Ed. 1761; LeMore v. United States, 5 Cir., 253 F. 887, certiorari denied 248 U.S. 586, 39 S.Ct. 184, 63 L.Ed. 434. It is enough if the “artifice” is designed to deceive as to the substantial identity of the thing to be received.…